1. You are currently not signed in. If you are already a registered user Please log in to get the full benefit from this site. If not, why not register and gain full access to our wonderful forums, view topics, make posts, and more! So if your not already a user, you can register by simply clicking the button to the right of this notice.

Food for Thought

Discussion in 'SECB Track Days' started by MaDProFF, Sep 23, 2013.

  1. MaDProFF

    MaDProFF World Superbike +

    Messages:
    2,475
  2. hoppielimp

    hoppielimp Fair Weather Rider +

    Messages:
    2,196
    reading that link...i'm not sure if anyone really knows why or what circumstance led to the court ruling against another participant at a track day. The only court case I am aware of that has been published was in 2007. If there is detail about the piston head posting then it would be good to have. Otherwise it could be the result of chinese whispers.

    This from a from a current UK track day insurance company. Remember, track day insurance only covers your bike and bits...no one else's.

    You have no coverage for any liability to third parties, whether personal injury/death or property. Damage is your problem following a test ruling at Wolverhampton County Court. His Honour Judge Mitchell concluded that if someone crashes into you on a trackday, even if it is clearly their fault - then tough! The judgement followed a case where a driver under tuition collided with a track day participant who then sued for damages. In essence the judge's ruling is that anyone participating on a trackday is aware of the potential risks involved and has a choice of not driving on to the circuit. (Source: Circuitdriver.com, April 2007)
     
  3. MaDProFF

    MaDProFF World Superbike +

    Messages:
    2,475
    Gareth Circumstances are all irrelevant, fact of the matter is someone has to fork out £21k after doing a track day whose ever fault it is, (I did actually try and source the court case very quick and not find anything else which I find quite odd, did say quick though). I think the driver was insured, and he was paid out by his insurance, but the insurance company then chased the person who they felt was at fault in court.

    So if you are doing a track day and cause an accident, if the person who you caused it to is insured for track days, he will claim for his damages, from his insurance company, and the insurance company comes after you. Just imagine if the claimant hand ended up in a wheel chair etc. you could lose everything :(
     
  4. hoppielimp

    hoppielimp Fair Weather Rider +

    Messages:
    2,196
    thats what i am saying, we do not know the circumstances, because circumstances is highly relevant here, of why (in the piston head forum) the judge ruled for the Insurance company.

    According to the case history ... you cannot claim against a third party on track days... There is case history (2007). Unless there is newer case history, then it would be good to know.

    At the moment...despite the pages of comments on piston heads...no-one has brought hardfacts of this £21k to light.

    All I can go on what has been given to me by a track day insurance company on the law as they understand it and a ruling to back it up. If I cannot claim on a third party on a track day participant, then neither can they..
     
  5. BlackHornet

    BlackHornet Look before you turn Staff Member Moderator +

    Messages:
    7,985
    :rolleyes: most likely more hearsay than fact in that post. I couldn't find a court ruling relating to it, could do with names and dates for a better search.

    With all the waviers we sign on track days i can't see how this would be possible unless one person had lied on the wavier and could therefore be held liable.
     
  6. hoppielimp

    hoppielimp Fair Weather Rider +

    Messages:
    2,196
    supposedly
    Claimant: Chaucer Insurance / Defendant: Owen Calloway
    Incident : 14th Feb 2010
    Judgement handed down : 19th September 2013
    Court : Bury St Edmunds County Court

    Something to note, Chaucer Insurance do not deal direct, you have to go through a broker.
     
  7. BlackHornet

    BlackHornet Look before you turn Staff Member Moderator +

    Messages:
    7,985
    nope i still can't find it, either i'm going blind or it didn't happen
     
  8. MaDProFF

    MaDProFF World Superbike +

    Messages:
    2,475
    I am sure there is some truth somewhere as Mickey Hutton from 675 is looking into it he works for Kev at brands, there are post ls on there
     
  9. hoppielimp

    hoppielimp Fair Weather Rider +

    Messages:
    2,196
    Be good to get an answer from Micky, since MSV is involved as TDO.
     
  10. BlackHornet

    BlackHornet Look before you turn Staff Member Moderator +

    Messages:
    7,985
    It's not a big worry even if true as it's a county court judgement so doesn't have a bearing on UK law. Whatever loop hole that would have been used to bring the case will no doubt be covered in a reworded waiver.
     
  11. MaDProFF

    MaDProFF World Superbike +

    Messages:
    2,475
    Tom, I am not sure a reworded waiver is necessarily going to stop you ending up in court, it is like me writing a T & C for my Company, saying no refunds on new goods, when clearly the UK law states people are entitled to a refund, that is the whole point of courts, just because there have been previous cases with a certain outcome does not mean it will stay like it forever. Will be interesting to see how Track day Companies deal with it and what advice they offer.
     
  12. BlackHornet

    BlackHornet Look before you turn Staff Member Moderator +

    Messages:
    7,985
    UK law doesn't give any rights to a refund. It's only if they are faulty or not fit for the purpose described. So as the waiver would make up part of the description of the goods purchased it would be good enough.
     
  13. hoppielimp

    hoppielimp Fair Weather Rider +

    Messages:
    2,196
    I have searched, British & Irish Legal Institute for past and present and recent cases, but can only find references to participants vs track/race operators, not track/race participants vs each other.

    Despite signing your life away, the underlying law being upheld is a duty of care to the participants.

    I wait with baited breath for some specifics on this track participant vs track participant...
     
    _Yappa_ likes this.
  14. Garya

    Garya World Superbike +

    Messages:
    825
    I would be screwed as everyone will sue me for loss of track time :laugh:
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice